"Still, even if the evidence is weak (at the moment) it should not be outright dismissed. The evidence for a low-carb/high-fat diet used to be considered very weak for a long time as well." But the data IS there. There's a difference between something being obscured and ignored, and something being created out of whole cloth. Sure, people deliberately distorted their conclusions to support their own agendas, but you can still go back to the originals and say "That study is fundamentally flawed, while that other one has been misinterpreted." Where are Blaylock's studies? Where is his proof? "Bring data or go home."
I can't understand how you can admire someone like Peter Attia, who really does do the science, and has the footnotes to prove it, and still take someone like Blaylock seriously. ANYONE who says they have all the answers should be immediately suspect. No one has all the answers. 771 days ago
;♥~*-:¦:-*♥~.•*´¨ )♥~*-:¦:-*♥~.•*´¨ )♥~*-: -*♥ “Light is contagious: one tiny spark can breathe new life into the extinguishing flame of another. So spread your Light everywhere.” Annemiek Douw ✲ •。* ✰ ˛★* 。° ✲。* •★ *˚。*。✰¦:-*♥ ;